...Home Page.
  ...La Civiltà Cattolica 1890.
  ...the Talmud OTJQ.
  ...Old Testament_OTJQ.
  ...New Testament_OTJQ.

On the Jewish Question


[Under Construction; Presently, just a scratch pad. Please check back, those readers that is who are not phobic to the truth.]


  Born within Time in Bethlehem, and also Existing from all Eternity. That does not sound like one more prophet, nor like a lesser figure than Moses.   AND THOU, BETHLEHEM Ephrata, art a little one among the thousands of Juda: out of thee shall he come forth unto me that is to be the ruler in Israel: and his going forth is from the beginning, from the days of eternity.  
      Micah 5:2  






Tannaim and Amoraim




... Well, not exactly why is it useful for these matters to be discussed, weighed, analyzed, but why is it appropriate to do so here, here on a website in support of a film about the unity of Christendom but much more so still about the re-unification of God's holy, orthodox, catholic, Orthodox-Catholic Church, The Church, the only Church, one, holy, catholic and apostolic? This a a big question. Comes the answer: Because the way in which this matter — On the Jewish Question — has been and is being handled by some of the episcopal leaders of the Orthodox-Catholic Church itself becomes an obstacle, a new obstacle, a gratuitous obstacle, a foolish and unnecessary obstacle, to the re-unification of the human element of The Church.

The Church in its Divine and Eternal aspect, the Church Triumphant, is, of course, always united and can never be divided and is in need of no healing

For the avoidance of doubt, and without regard to the views of the reader of these paragraphs or indeed the views of the writer of these paragraphs, if the episcopal college of leaders of any of:


    the Coptic Orthodox Church of Alexandria,
the Syriac Orthodox Church of Antioch (including the Malankara Jacobite Syrian Orthodox Church in India),
the Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church (also called the Indian Orthodox Church),
the Armenian Apostolic Church,
the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church (including the the Eritrean Orthodox Tewahedo Church),
the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople,
the Orthodox Church of Alexandria,
the Orthodox Church of Antioch,
the Orthodox Church of Jerusalem,
the Orthodox Church of Russia,
the Orthodox Church of Serbia,
the Orthodox Church of Romania,
the Orthodox Church of Bulgaria,
the Orthodox Church of Georgia,
the Orthodox Church of Cyprus,
the Orthodox Church of Greece,
the Orthodox Church of Poland,
the Orthodox Church of Albania, or
the Orthodox Church of the Czech lands and Slovakia,

is firmly and steadfastly resolved that the religious doctrine of, by way of prime example, the Catholic Church dealing with the Jewish Question is an impediment to re-unification, then indeed such is an impediment.

They are so resolved.





Abstracted from Bull Cantate Domino, Council of Florence, 1441

Pope Eugene IV (* 1383 in Venice; r. 3 March 1431 to 23 February 1447 †):

“The most Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that none of those existing outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans, but also Jews and heretics and schismatics, can have a share in life eternal; but that they will go into the eternal fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels, unless before death they are joined with Her; and that so important is the unity of this ecclesiastical body that only those remaining within this unity can profit by the sacraments of the Church unto salvation, and they alone can receive an eternal recompense for their fasts, their almsgivings, their other works of Christian piety and the duties of a Christian soldier. No one, let his almsgiving be as great as it may, no one, even if he pour out his blood for the Name of Christ, can be saved, unless he remain within the bosom and the unity of the Catholic Church.


“It firmly believes, professes, and teaches that the matter pertaining to the law of the Old Testament, of the Mosaic law, which are divided into ceremonies, sacred rites, sacrifices, and sacraments, because they were established to signify something in the future, although they were suited to the divine worship at that time, after our Lord’s coming had been signified by them, ceased, and the sacraments of the New Testament began; and that whoever, even after the passion, placed hope in these matters of the law and submitted himself to them as necessary for salvation, as if faith in Christ could not save without them, sinned mortally. Yet it does not deny that after the passion of Christ up to the promulgation of the Gospel they could have been observed until they were believed to be in no way necessary for salvation; but after the promulgation of the Gospel it asserts that they cannot be observed without the loss of eternal salvation. All, therefore, who after that time observe circumcision and the Sabbath and the other requirements of the law, it declares alien to the Christian faith and not in the least fit to participate in eternal salvation, unless someday they recover from these errors.”






.. And, unlike in the closely related case of the way in which some of the episcopal leaders of the Orthodox-Catholic Church are dealing with the issue of understanding Islam, in the case of the Jewish Question there is another factor, the significance of which can hardly be overstated. Though that portion of European Christendom which is the United States of America supplies the prime and most extreme example at this time, really throughout all of European Christendom over the past half century Jews control the public dissemination of information, the expression, "exercise enormously disproportionate influence," no longer being adequate. For writing the preceding sentence, the present writer has disqualified himself as a practical matter from retaining or securing a position not only in the United States, but in Germany or Australia or any other corner of EC, in institutions or organizations in any of the following branches of information dissemination: print journalism; broadcast media; advertising; major music recording and distribution; major social media outlets; soft-cover book publishing; universities; most "think tanks", including of course those which identify themselves as conservative or libertarian; and of course the film industry in Hollywood and elsewhere throughout European Christendom. Jews do not and will not want the Orthodox-Catholic Church re-unified. The information they choose to allow to be disseminated will not be in the service of that goal. Less still will they want a sense of unity and civilizational integrity instilled or rekindled within the minds and hearts of the Descendants of European Christendom.

From 70 Anno Domini to the present date it has not been Peru or Pakistan, China, Nigeria, India, Indonesia, Japan or the Philippines which have played host to the vast and overwhelming majority of world Jewry. The Jews did not seek out these peoples, to settle within their massive territories. Chongqing has been dramatically closer to Jerusalem than is Chicago both before and after 1917, and Dehli is closer than is Dublin, Busan than is Buenos Aires, Dushanbe than is Düsseldorf, and they are overland not overseas. So too did European Christendom make possible the Jewish State of Israel. Considering the forgoing, however regrettable and distasteful is this distracting tract, some comments on the Christian understanding of the Jewish Question are appropriate here.

And yet another factor cries out to be given utterance: The issues dividing the three camps, the three broad groupings within the Orthodox-Catholic Church — Oriental Orthodox (non-Chalcedonian), Orthodox and Catholic — deal with matters of first importance, universal and eternal. The Oriental Orthodox have been out of Communion with the other two since at least the time period around the Fourth Ecumenical Council, the Council of Chalcedon of 451 A.D. And these other two, the Orthodox and the Catholics, have themselves been in open and sustained breach at the very least since the Sack of Constantinople in 1204 during the Fourth Crusade, but really since the events of 1054, and even to a large extent since the Nicholas-Photian Schism of the second half of the 9th century, including the Fourth Council of Constantinople (Catholic, not Orthodox; 5 October 869 to 28 February 870). So by way of the briefest of synopses, one enters here into discussions of matters of first importance which have plagued the Church for a millennium and even going out to near on sixteen centuries. By nearly the sharpest contrast imaginable, as regards to any and all dealings with the Abortionists and the Homosexualists, the Masons and the Mormons, the Muslims and the Modernists, and the Talmudic and atheist "Jews", this is the easy and obvious and straightforward stuff, speaking and writing the truth and maintaining courageous Christian comportment in dealing with these folks and phenomena. This is the low-hanging fruit. Whether it is intellect or knowledge or integrity and/or supernatural faith which is left wanting in a particular individual's case, if a person can not even get it right with this easy and obvious stuff, how can such a person be trusted to participate in finding solutions to the first issues separating our three groups within the Orthodox-Catholic Church? The answer is obvious. Such a person, be he lay or cleric, be his leadership self-appointed or be his leadership position universally recognized or anything in between, people who can not be trusted with the easy stuff should not be trusted with the matters of first import.


  Αλήθεια Φοβία Αλήθεια Φοβική Truth Phobic  



עולם   תיקון
olam   Tikkun
That is, Tikkun Olam
The Jews « repairing the world »
In all their generosity, creating their version
Of “heaven on earth” for all of us to enjoy.



"Raba said: If one bound his neighbour and he died of starvation, he is not liable to execution. Raba also said: If he bound him in the sun, and he died, or in a place of intense cold and he died, he is liable; but if the sun was yet to appear, or the cold to make itself felt, he is not ..."
... from the Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin, Folio 77a (and see also 77b)

  Kaganovich Holodomor architect

Lazar Moiseyevich Kaganovich – Лазарь Моисеевич Каганович




  Голодомор в Україні 1932—1933 — Голодомор на Украине — The Holodomor  
  "death by hunger" or "to kill by hunger" or "to starve to death" or "extermination by hunger" or "hunger-extermination"  



  I. Who is a Jew?  


  Executive Summary: Anyone who self-identifies as being a Jew is a Jew.  


  The First Words of the New Testament of the Bible  
  (I) That genetic descent was of paramount importance to the First Century people among whom God chose to be incarnate in the person of the Second Person of the Most Holy Trinity, and (II) that the Apostles and other New Testament writers understood this are not in doubt. Jesus Abrahamic (and Davidic) Credentials are the subject of the first verse of the first chapter of the first bood of the New Testament, with detailed elaboration directly following.  

The book of the genealogy of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham.

Matthew 1:1




  How endogamous?  



As unsatisfactory as this answer is, in the middle of the second decade of the XXI century, that may well be the best summary of where things stand. Library shelves, certainly, but perhaps one may even say libraries, are full of monographs and other studies that have been produced over centuries running and that have considered this matter from every imaginable angle. Over very recent decades improvements in genealogical DNA testing have introduced potentials in the field of genetic genealogy, isolation of haploid genotypes (haplotypes), and so forth, that most of us find fascinating. Indeed perhaps we are too captivated by the genealogical aspects of this rapidly developing science, at least we Christians, who believe that all people are the created children of the One and only God, who made us in His image and likeness.

Still, writing these words is unlikely to bring about any diminution in interest, but maybe a few words of caution will be digestible. Firstly, recognize a distinction between the actual scientific results of any investigations, and the way that such are presented in papers you may read and lectures you may audit. Consider the source, and wait for results to be replicated by other laboratories and institutions. Then consider what interests may underlie, what relationships may exist among, those others too.

Very few adherents of Rabbic Judaism — well, none in fact — are going to want to admit of anything that questions their separateness. This situation is itself curious, not a desire for actual separation, of living out a life separately, but a desire to convince others, and themselves, that they are in fact separate, are set apart. In pre-Shoah times the emphasis was quite different, though of course genealogical DNA testing also had not yet come about.

And one might interject a sub-theme, that one is presented here with the spectacle, not of a numerically and militarily dominant Christian power trying to ferret out who is a Jew, with a view toward persecuting or expelling the same. Accepting that levels of assimilation, and thus the difficulty of the task, varied from place to place over the centuries, but still at some basic level, when the Jews were sought out so that they could be expelled from, for example:

  • Brittany in 1240, or
  • England in 1290, or
  • Hungary in 1367, or
  • France in 1394, or
  • Mainz in 1012 or 1474, or
  • Ravenna in 1491, or
  • Spain, Sicily and Sardinia in 1492 by the Catholic Monarchs, Ferdinand and Isabella, or
  • Krakow in 1495, or
  • Portugal (complicated mix of forced conversions and expulsions) in 1497, or
  • Naples in 1541, or
  • the Papal States (except Rome and Ancona) by Pope Saint Pius V in 1569, or
  • Venice and the Adriatic Islands (not much enforced) in 1571, or

... well, let us stop here for now. This list could be expanded enormously from where things stood centuries before the Nazis and their Nürnberger Gesetze (which, unknown it seems to 99 percent of people in The West, actually deemed as non-Jews huge numbers of people who were Jews by Talmudic law and by self-identification). And of course the argument facially in evidence is a two-edged one, at least two-edged, that is:

Christian powers were, everywhere if not always, despicable and vindictive in their perennial scapegoating of this subtle people, or there were in fact some fundamental and ultimately inescapable characteristics in the Jewish people which made and makes it impossible for them to abide in harmony over the long hall with Christians within Christendom.

But returning to the point at hand, to expell a people there had to be a people to expell, so in these earlier times it was the problem of the expelling power to determine that this or that man was that separate creature, a Jew. Of course, depending on the level of assimilation, this may not have been much of a problem. In our late XX and early XXI century times it is, in significant part, the problem of the Jew to establish to others, and to himself, that he is something, is someone, set apart, that Jews do in fact (still) exist as a discrete and insular people, and indeed as a people with genetic continuity back to the Aaronic priesthood and in fact back to Abraham. When once genetic genealogy, genealogical DNA testing and analysis, enter this purview, take a guess how Jews will relate to the matter. Obviously, the vast majority will embrace findings which support their separateness and continuity in Abrahamic descent.

This, not monotheism and the Tanakh, is the essence and epicenter of Jewish identity.

Minor additions or subtractions will be tolerated. But with any finding which suggest, worse yet purport to prove conclusively, a fundamental discontinuity — allow that means a large Asiatic-Khazar genetic admixture or (conversely?) a large European one, that Jews are in fact just our fellows — expect rejection and obfuscation whereever such are possible.

Interesting times.



  Willing to follow a tangent, a train of thought, are you dear reader?  




  For you, brethren, became imitators of the churches of God in Christ Jesus which are in Judea; for you suffered the same things from your own countrymen as they did from the Jews, who killed both the Lord Jesus and the prophets, and drove us out, and displease God and oppose all men by hindering us from speaking to the Gentiles that they may be saved -- so as always to fill up the measure of their sins. But God's wrath has come upon them at last!  
    Apostle Saint Paul (formerly the devout Pharisee and active enemy of the Church, Saul of Tarsus) in his First Letter to the Thessalonians 2:14-16  



  Who is the liar but he who denies that Jesus is the Christ? This is the antichrist, he who denies the Father and the Son. No one who denies the Son has the Father. He who confesses the Son has the Father also.  
    1 John 2:22-23  



  I know your works. Behold, I have set before you an open door, which no one is able to shut; I know that you have but little power, and yet you have kept my word and have not denied my name. Behold, I will make those of the synagogue of Satan who say that they are Jews and are not, but lie -- behold, I will make them come and bow down before your feet, and learn that I have loved you. Because you have kept my word of patient endurance, I will keep you from the hour of trial which is coming on the whole world, to try those who dwell upon the earth. I am coming soon; hold fast what you have, so that no one may seize your crown.  
    Revelation 3:8-11  




... some Terminology:      


Tanakh ךְ"תַּנ  

The Tanakh means the entire canon of the Hebrew or Jewish Bible. It is actually an acronym, comprised of the first Hebrew letter of each of the Masoretic Text's three traditional subdivisions:

  • Torah - תּוֹרָה ("Teaching"),
  • Nevi'im - נְבִיאִים ("Prophets") and
  • Ketuvim - כְּתוּבִים ("Writings").

thus TaNaKh (transliteration limitations, as in English it appears as though the acronym would be better rendered as Tonek — ToNeK).

For Catholic, Orthodox and Oriental Orthodox Christians, that is, for the Orthodox-Catholic Church, the Old Testament canon can be spoken of as including protocanonical scripture and deuterocanonical scripture. The protocanonical books are: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy, Joshua, Judges, Ruth, 1–2 Samuel, 1–2 Kings, 1–2 Chronicles, Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther, Job, Psalms, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Solomon, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Lamentations, Ezekiel, Daniel, Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah, Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, Haggai, Zechariah, and Malachi. The term deuterocanonical, from the Greek, means "belonging to the second canon," but these deuterocanonical scriptures, unfortunately with some comparatively very minor variations among the Churches as to which scripture makes the list, are considered canonical by Catholics, Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox.


; corresponding, though not exactly, to what Christians call the Old Testament. This Jewish canon is also referred to as the Masoretic Text, indeed Tanakh is But note that oldest extant copies of the Masoretic Text date from the 9th or 10th Centuries, AD. The oldest nearly complete manuscripts of the Jewish canon in any language are manuscripts of the Septuagint -- the LXX, the Koine Greek translation of the Hebrew Scriptures completed in Alexandria around 100 BC, or a little earlier -- the oldest of which are included in the Codex Vaticanus (4th Century, Anno Domini), the Codex Sinaiticus (4th Century, Anno Domini), and the Codex Alexandrinus (5th Century, Anno Domini), all three of which derive from the same LXX. Other manuscripts of only fragments of the Jewish canon are much older than either the Septuagint or the Masoretic Text. Understanding differences among Septuagint, Masoretic and Vulgate manuscripts and textual analysis and criticism of these is a highly specialized and complex science which the present writer is not remotely qualified to enter into even in the most introductory ways that might be imagined.

Torah תּוֹרָה Pentateuch - Πεντάτευχος

Torah is synonymous with Pentateuch only in part. Though there may still be scholarly debate as to how ancient the tradition is of dividing the first part of the Bible into five books, the Greek word Pentateuch refers to those Five Books of Moses, the written Torah, in Hebrew תּוֹרָה. This Pentateuch, these Five Books are:

  • Genesis - Γένεση (ή Γένεσις) - (origin), in Hebrew Bereshit / בְּרֵאשִׁית, "In the beginning";
  • Exodus - Έξοδος (going out), in Hebrew, Shemot / שִׁמוֹת, "Names";
  • Leviticus - Λευιτικός (relating to the Levites), in Hebrew Vayikra / ויקרא, literally "And He called";
  • Numbers - Ἀριθμοί (numbering of the Isrealites), in Hebrew Bəmidbar / במדבר, literally "In the desert [of]"; and
  • Deuteronomy - Δευτερονόμιον (second law), in Hebrew Devarim / דברים, literally "Things" or "Words" .

But Torah — "direction" or "instruction" or "teaching" or "the Law" — in Jewish use can also refer, in addition to these Five Books of Moses, to so-called oral Torah, ordinances which put into effect the laws contained in the Pentateuch and commentaries or indeed to the totality of Jewish doctrine. At all events the Torah as Pentateuch is the foundational text of Judaism and is part of the Tanakh, the Jewish Bible.



Talmudim     The Talmud (meaning in English instruction or study) is the main text of Rabbinic Judaism. More accurately one should refer to the Talmudim (plural) as there are two main redactions, the earlier Jerusalem or Palestinian Talmud and the more complete and much more frequently referred to Babylonian Talmud. The Talmud or Talmudim is Rabbinic Judaism's main document, if the word document can be appropriately applied to a redaction of the literary output of thousands of rabbis over a period of centuries which in the standard text of the twenty-volume Babylonian Talmud prints to about 6500 pages.
      Jerusalem Talmud יְרוּשָׁלְמִי-- תַּלְמוּד Jerusalem Talmud–Talmud Yerushalmi, or more accurately the Palestinian Talmud or Talmud de-Eretz Yisrael, as it was primarily the work of the academies of Tiberias and Caesarea. Compiled c. 300 to 350 A.D.
      Babylonian Talmud בבלי-- תַּלְמוּד Babylonian Talmud–Talmud Bavli, more complete, and also more independent, that is, more reflective of actual Jewish belief, as by 350 A.D. Jerusalem and the Levant were under the control of the increasingly Christian Byzantine Roman Empire, while the Christian influence in Babylon was much less pronounced and widespread during the compilation of the Babylonian Gemara. Compiled c. 450 to 500 A.D.




  Raymundus Martinus – Ramon Martí (* 1220 – 1285 †), Dominican friar and theologian from Catalan and the author, among other works of Pugio Fidei (c. 1270).  




The Aaronic priesthood from Temple Judaism, direct patrilineal descent from the three-years older brother of Moses, Aaron        
  singular     plural    
  כֹּהֵן transliterated/rendered in English as kohain or kohen or cohen   כֹּהֲנִים kohanim  




    scupture in Vatican Museums of Titus Flāvius Caesar Vespasiānus Augustus
    Titus Flāvius Caesar Vespasiānus Augustus (r. 24 June 79 – 13 September 81);
led the Siege of Jerusalem in 70 AD. The Second Temple, the foundations of
which were laid in 535 BC after the return of some Jews to Jerusalem following
their (ancestors') exile to Babylon some 50-60 years earlier, was consecrated
in 516 BC. This Second Temple was reconstructed, the Temple Mount expanded,
beginning in the reign of Herod I (37 BC - 4 BC). It was then this Second Temple
which was destroyed undet the leadership of General and future Emperor Titus
on the 9th day of the Hebrew month of Av, in the year 70 AD.
Marble sculpture in the Vatican Museums.



  This day are (all) good things made lawful for you. The food of those who have received the Scripture is lawful for you, and your food is lawful for them. And so are the virtuous women of the believers and the virtuous women of those who received the Scripture before you (lawful for you) when ye give them their marriage portions and live with them in honour, not in fornication, nor taking them as secret concubines. Whoso denieth the faith, his work is vain and he will be among the losers in the Hereafter.  
    Qur'an 5:5  



The Assyrian Captivity (722 BC until the present, that is, they never returned) These are the Ten Lost Tribes of Isreal.  
  Also known as, the Assyrian Exile of the Ten Tribes of the Northern Kingdom of Israel, with its capital at Samaria — though not of the Southern Kingdom of Judah, the Tribes of Judah and Benjamin, with its capital of Jerusalem — which began in c. 740 BC and was completed under Assyrian King Sargon II in 722 BC, and which is recorded in the Bible in II Kings and in I and II Chronicles.  


The Babylonian Captivity (Began 597 BC with deportations which continued through c. 581 BC, it began to end in 539 BC)  


Second Temple Period (536 B.C. – 70 A.D.)    



  Then Pharisees and scribes came to Jesus from Jerusalem and said, "Why do your disciples transgress the tradition of the elders? For they do not wash their hands when they eat." He answered them, "And why do you transgress the commandment of God for the sake of your tradition? For God commanded, `Honor your father and your mother,' and, `He who speaks evil of father or mother, let him surely die.' But you say, `If any one tells his father or his mother, What you would have gained from me is given to God, he need not honor his father.' So, for the sake of your tradition, you have made void the word of God. You hypocrites! Well did Isaiah prophesy of you, when he said: `This people honors me with their lips, but their heart is far from me; in vain do they worship me, teaching as doctrines the precepts of men.'" And he called the people to him and said to them, "Hear and understand: not what goes into the mouth defiles a man, but what comes out of the mouth, this defiles a man." Then the disciples came and said to him, "Do you know that the Pharisees were offended when they heard this saying?" He answered, "Every plant which my heavenly Father has not planted will be rooted up. Let them alone; they are blind guides. And if a blind man leads a blind man, both will fall into a pit."  
    Matthew 15:1-14 (and similar at Mark 7)  



  ... Mortalium Animos .  




Christ Before...the People by Антокольский-Antokolsky

Christ Before...the People
By Антокольский-Antokolsky (1840-1902), celebrated Russian-Jewish sculptor

  And Mary said: My soul doth magnify the Lord. And my spirit hath rejoiced in God my Saviour. Because he hath regarded the humility of his handmaid; for behold from henceforth all generations shall call me blessed. Because he that is mighty, hath done great things to me; and holy is his name. And his mercy is from generation unto generations, to them that fear him. He hath shewed might in his arm: he hath scattered the proud in the conceit of their heart. He hath put down the mighty from their seat, and hath exalted the humble. He hath filled the hungry with good things; and the rich he hath sent empty away. He hath received Israel his servant, being mindful of his mercy: As he spoke to our fathers, to Abraham and to his seed for ever.    
    Luke 1:46-55    
  The LORD reflected: "Shall I hide from Abraham what I am about to do, now that he is to become a great and populous nation, and all the nations of the earth are to find blessing in him? Indeed, I have singled him out that he may direct his sons and his posterity to keep the way of the LORD by doing what is right and just, so that the LORD may carry into effect for Abraham the promises he made about him."    
    Genesis 18:17-19    
  "I swear by myself, declares the LORD, that because you acted as you did in not withholding from me your beloved son, will bless you abundantly and make your descendants as countless as the stars of the sky and the sands of the seashore; your descendants shall take possession of the gates of their enemies, and in your descendants all the nations of the earth shall find blessing - all this because you obeyed my command.''    
    Genesis 22:16-18    
  And do not presume to say to yourselves, 'We have Abraham as our father.' For I tell you, God can raise up children to Abraham from these stones. Even now the ax lies at the root of the trees. Therefore every tree that does not bear good fruit will be cut down and thrown into the fire.I am baptizing you with water, for repentance, but the one who is coming after me is mightier than I. I am not worthy to carry his sandals. He will baptize you with the holy Spirit and fire.    
    Matthew 3:9-11; Luke 3-8    
  Then he saith to his servants: The marriage indeed is ready; but they that were invited were not worthy. Go ye therefore into the highways; and as many as you shall find, call to the marriage.    

Matthew 22:8-9








  Spinoza sculpture in Russian Museum in Saint Petersburg by Антокольский-Antokolsky  

Марк Матвеевич (рожд. Мордух Матысович) Антокольский – Mark Matveyevich (born Mordukh Matisovich) Antokolsky (1843 in Vilnius — in Frankfurt-am-Main 1902). Antokolsky was a Russian-Lithuanian-Jewish sculptor of extraordinary gifts and creative output. However theologically incongruous, his themes, the subjects he chose, were overwhelmingly Christian or "Jewish". Considering how much of his adult productive years he spent outside of the Russian Empire — in Germany, Italy, France — the explanation that his Christian works were conceived as part of a survival strategy for a Jew of the Russian Empire is not wholly satisfactory. It is striking though that his fame was in large part the product of Tsar-Emperor Alexander II purchasing for the Hermitage Antokolsky's sculpture of Ivan the Terrible. One can reflect also on his choice of Germany as a residence, and on the fact that the supposed virulent "anti-Semitism" of Tsar-Emperor Nicholas II, did not affect Antokolsky's fame and fortune, or his body being received back in Saint Petersburg with the honors of a celebrated artist.

Baruch Spinoza – Барух Спиноза
(later also Benedictus de Spinoza – Benedito de Espinosa)
(1632 Amsterdam - den Haag 1677)
To an important point, will some energetic students reading these lines perhaps reflect and research, though we in the XX and XXI centuries have become very much accustomed to Jews awarding each other Nobel Prizes and the like, but for the eighteen hundred years from The Resurrection in circa 33 Anno Domini through the mid XVIII century were there any accomplishments by Jews in science, architecture, engineering or mathematics? What exactly did Spinoza, the proto-European Jew "scientist" contribute to science? But Marx and Nietzsche both seemed to have liked him well enough. On religion, Spinoza was the proto-secular atheist Jew, despised even by the Talmud teachers. He was also something of a de facto trail-blazer for later Protestant Biblical deconstructionists, arguing against Mosaic authorship of (at least portions of) the Pentateuch.






  Deuteronomy Chapter 28     Romans Chapter 11  
"And if you obey the voice of the LORD your God, being careful to do all his commandments which I command you this day, the LORD your God will set you high above all the nations of the earth. And all these blessings shall come upon you and overtake you, if you obey the voice of the LORD your God. Blessed shall you be in the city, and blessed shall you be in the field. Blessed shall be the fruit of your body, and the fruit of your ground, and the fruit of your beasts, the increase of your cattle, and the young of your flock. Blessed shall be your basket and your kneading-trough. Blessed shall you be when you come in, and blessed shall you be when you go out. "The LORD will cause your enemies who rise against you to be defeated before you; they shall come out against you one way, and flee before you seven ways. The LORD will command the blessing upon you in your barns, and in all that you undertake; and he will bless you in the land which the LORD your God gives you. The LORD will establish you as a people holy to himself, as he has sworn to you, if you keep the commandments of the LORD your God, and walk in his ways. And all the peoples of the earth shall see that you are called by the name of the LORD; and they shall be afraid of you. And the LORD will make you abound in prosperity, in the fruit of your body, and in the fruit of your cattle, and in the fruit of your ground, within the land which the LORD swore to your fathers to give you. The LORD will open to you his good treasury the heavens, to give the rain of your land in its season and to bless all the work of your hands; and you shall lend to many nations, but you shall not borrow. And the LORD will make you the head, and not the tail; and you shall tend upward only, and not downward; if you obey the commandments of the LORD your God, which I command you this day, being careful to do them, and if you do not turn aside from any of the words which I command you this day, to the right hand or to the left, to go after other gods to serve them.     I ask, then, has God rejected his people? By no means! I myself am an Israelite, a descendant of Abraham, a member of the tribe of Benjamin. God has not rejected his people whom he foreknew. Do you not know what the scripture says of Elijah, how he pleads with God against Israel?  
“Lord, they have killed thy prophets, they have demolished thy altars, and I alone am left, and they seek my life.”
    But what is God’s reply to him?  
“I have kept for myself seven thousand men who have not bowed the knee to Baal.”
    So too at the present time there is a remnant, chosen by grace. But if it is by grace, it is no longer on the basis of works; otherwise grace would no longer be grace.  
"But if you will not obey the voice of the LORD your God or be careful to do all his commandments and his statutes which I command you this day, then all these curses shall come upon you and overtake you. Cursed shall you be in the city, and cursed shall you be in the field. Cursed shall be your basket and your kneading-trough. Cursed shall be the fruit of your body, and the fruit of your ground, the increase of your cattle, and the young of your flock. Cursed shall you be when you come in, and cursed shall you be when you go out. "The LORD will send upon you curses, confusion, and frustration, in all that you undertake to do, until you are destroyed and perish quickly, on account of the evil of your doings, because you have forsaken me. The LORD will make the pestilence cleave to you until he has consumed you off the land which you are entering to take possession of it. The LORD will smite you with consumption, and with fever, inflammation, and fiery heat, and with drought, and with blasting, and with mildew; they shall pursue you until you perish. And the heavens over your head shall be brass, and the earth under you shall be iron. The LORD will make the rain of your land powder and dust; from heaven it shall come down upon you until you are destroyed.     What then? Israel failed to obtain what it sought. The elect obtained it, but the rest were hardened, as it is written,  
“God gave them a spirit of stupor,
eyes that should not see and ears that should not hear,
down to this very day.”
    And David says,  
“Let their feast become a snare and a trap,
a pitfall and a retribution for them;
let their eyes be darkened so that they cannot see,
and bend their backs for ever.”
"The LORD will cause you to be defeated before your enemies; you shall go out one way against them, and flee seven ways before them; and you shall be a horror to all the kingdoms of the earth. And your dead body shall be food for all birds of the air, and for the beasts of the earth; and there shall be no one to frighten them away. The LORD will smite you with the boils of Egypt, and with the ulcers and the scurvy and the itch, of which you cannot be healed. The LORD will smite you with madness and blindness and confusion of mind; and you shall grope at noonday, as the blind grope in darkness, and you shall not prosper in your ways; and you shall be only oppressed and robbed continually, and there shall be no one to help you. You shall betroth a wife, and another man shall lie with her; you shall build a house, and you shall not dwell in it; you shall plant a vineyard, and you shall not use the fruit of it. Your ox shall be slain before your eyes, and you shall not eat of it; your ass shall be violently taken away before your face, and shall not be restored to you; your sheep shall be given to your enemies, and there shall be no one to help you. Your sons and your daughters shall be given to another people, while your eyes look on and fail with longing for them all the day; and it shall not be in the power of your hand to prevent it. A nation which you have not known shall eat up the fruit of your ground and of all your labors; and you shall be only oppressed and crushed continually; so that you shall be driven mad by the sight which your eyes shall see. The LORD will smite you on the knees and on the legs with grievous boils of which you cannot be healed, from the sole of your foot to the crown of your head.     So I ask, have they stumbled so as to fall? By no means! But through their trespass salvation has come to the Gentiles, so as to make Israel jealous. Now if their trespass means riches for the world, and if their failure means riches for the Gentiles, how much more will their full inclusion mean! Now I am speaking to you Gentiles. Inasmuch then as I am an apostle to the Gentiles, I magnify my ministry in order to make my fellow Jews jealous, and thus save some of them. For if their rejection means the reconciliation of the world, what will their acceptance mean but life from the dead? If the dough offered as first fruits is holy, so is the whole lump; and if the root is holy, so are the branches. But if some of the branches were broken off, and you, a wild olive shoot, were grafted in their place to share the richness of the olive tree, do not boast over the branches. If you do boast, remember it is not you that support the root, but the root that supports you. You will say, “Branches were broken off so that I might be grafted in.” That is true. They were broken off because of their unbelief, but you stand fast only through faith. So do not become proud, but stand in awe. For if God did not spare the natural branches, neither will he spare you. Note then the kindness and the severity of God: severity toward those who have fallen, but God’s kindness to you, provided you continue in his kindness; otherwise you too will be cut off. And even the others, if they do not persist in their unbelief, will be grafted in, for God has the power to graft them in again. For if you have been cut from what is by nature a wild olive tree, and grafted, contrary to nature, into a cultivated olive tree, how much more will these natural branches be grafted back into their own olive tree.  
"The LORD will bring you, and your king whom you set over you, to a nation that neither you nor your fathers have known; and there you shall serve other gods, of wood and stone. And you shall become a horror, a proverb, and a byword, among all the peoples where the LORD will lead you away. You shall carry much seed into the field, and shall gather little in; for the locust shall consume it. You shall plant vineyards and dress them, but you shall neither drink of the wine nor gather the grapes; for the worm shall eat them. You shall have olive trees throughout all your territory, but you shall not anoint yourself with the oil; for your olives shall drop off. You shall beget sons and daughters, but they shall not be yours; for they shall go into captivity. All your trees and the fruit of your ground the locust shall possess. The sojourner who is among you shall mount above you higher and higher; and you shall come down lower and lower. He shall lend to you, and you shall not lend to him; he shall be the head, and you shall be the tail. All these curses shall come upon you and pursue you and overtake you, till you are destroyed, because you did not obey the voice of the LORD your God, to keep his commandments and his statutes which he commanded you. They shall be upon you as a sign and a wonder, and upon your descendants for ever.     Lest you be wise in your own conceits, I want you to understand this mystery, brethren: a hardening has come upon part of Israel, until the full number of the Gentiles come in, and so all Israel will be saved; as it is written,  

“The Deliverer will come from Zion,
he will banish ungodliness from Jacob”;

“and this will be my covenant with them
when I take away their sins.”


"Because you did not serve the LORD your God with joyfulness and gladness of heart, by reason of the abundance of all things, therefore you shall serve your enemies whom the LORD will send against you, in hunger and thirst, in nakedness, and in want of all things; and he will put a yoke of iron upon your neck, until he has destroyed you. The LORD will bring a nation against you from afar, from the end of the earth, as swift as the eagle flies, a nation whose language you do not understand, a nation of stern countenance, who shall not regard the person of the old or show favor to the young, and shall eat the offspring of your cattle and the fruit of your ground, until you are destroyed; who also shall not leave you grain, wine, or oil, the increase of your cattle or the young of your flock, until they have caused you to perish. They shall besiege you in all your towns, until your high and fortified walls, in which you trusted, come down throughout all your land; and they shall besiege you in all your towns throughout all your land, which the LORD your God has given you. And you shall eat the offspring of your own body, the flesh of your sons and daughters, whom the LORD your God has given you, in the siege and in the distress with which your enemies shall distress you. The man who is the most tender and delicately bred among you will grudge food to his brother, to the wife of his bosom, and to the last of the children who remain to him; so that he will not give to any of them any of the flesh of his children whom he is eating, because he has nothing left him, in the siege and in the distress with which your enemy shall distress you in all your towns. The most tender and delicately bred woman among you, who would not venture to set the sole of her foot upon the ground because she is so delicate and tender, will grudge to the husband of her bosom, to her son and to her daughter, her afterbirth that comes out from between her feet and her children whom she bears, because she will eat them secretly, for want of all things, in the siege and in the distress with which your enemy shall distress you in your towns.

    As regards the gospel they are enemies of God, for your sake; but as regards election they are beloved for the sake of their forefathers. For the gifts and the call of God are irrevocable. Just as you were once disobedient to God but now have received mercy because of their disobedience, so they have now been disobedient in order that by the mercy shown to you they also may receive mercy. For God has consigned all men to disobedience, that he may have mercy upon all.  
    O the depth of the riches and wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his judgments and how inscrutable his ways!  

“For who has known the mind of the Lord,
or who has been his counselor?”

“Or who has given a gift to him
that he might be repaid?”

    For from him and through him and to him are all things. To him be glory for ever. Amen.  
"If you are not careful to do all the words of this law which are written in this book, that you may fear this glorious and awful name, the LORD your God, then the LORD will bring on you and your offspring extraordinary afflictions, afflictions severe and lasting, and sicknesses grievous and lasting. And he will bring upon you again all the diseases of Egypt, which you were afraid of; and they shall cleave to you. Every sickness also, and every affliction which is not recorded in the book of this law, the LORD will bring upon you, until you are destroyed. Whereas you were as the stars of heaven for multitude, you shall be left few in number; because you did not obey the voice of the LORD your God. And as the LORD took delight in doing you good and multiplying you, so the LORD will take delight in bringing ruin upon you and destroying you; and you shall be plucked off the land which you are entering to take possession of it. And the LORD will scatter you among all peoples, from one end of the earth to the other; and there you shall serve other gods, of wood and stone, which neither you nor your fathers have known. And among these nations you shall find no ease, and there shall be no rest for the sole of your foot; but the LORD will give you there a trembling heart, and failing eyes, and a languishing soul; your life shall hang in doubt before you; night and day you shall be in dread, and have no assurance of your life. In the morning you shall say, `Would it were evening!' and at evening you shall say, `Would it were morning!' because of the dread which your heart shall fear, and the sights which your eyes shall see. And the LORD will bring you back in ships to Egypt, a journey which I promised that you should never make again; and there you shall offer yourselves for sale to your enemies as male and female slaves, but no man will buy you."



  Ubiquitous Commitment to Moral Disorder and Rot  
  The Jewish Connection  


  "ADL has long been in the forefront of national and state efforts to deter and counteract hate crimes. Criminal activity motivated by bias is different from other criminal conduct; in a hate crime, the perpetrator attacks the victi against the victim's actual or perceived status, such as the victim's race, religion, national origin, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, or disability. Now, 45 states, the District of Columbia, and the federal government have enacted hate crimes laws based on (or similar to) ADL's model statute."
    From the Jewish Anti-Defamation League website, the ultimate goal of which is the dissolution of Christendom, above all European Christendom, and the undermining of all things Christian.




Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. ___, June 26, 2015



For the Majority of SCOTUS, the Supreme Court of the United States:
Kennedy (lapsed Catholic), Ginsburg (Jewess monster), Breyer (Jew), Sotomayor (fake Catholic, really a Jewess), Kagan (Jewess and probable lesbian)

For the Dissent, trying but failing to cling to last vestiges of decency:
Roberts (Catholic), Scalia (Catholic), Thomas (Catholic), Alito (Catholic)







As the first edition, DSM-I of 1952, degenerated into the now current fifth edition, the DSM-5 (published 18 May 2013), the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) has now become noteworthy for its medicalization of human distress and general lack of intellectual and scientific integrity. But back in the day it was a useful tool for classification and enhanced understanding of mental disorders. ... well, maybe. Robert Spitzer, emeritus professor of psychiatry at Columbia University was the chief architect and driving force behind the changes which became the DSM-III of 1980, but years earlier Spitzer spearheaded the American Psychiatric Association's 1973 decision to remove homosexuality from DSM's list of mental disorders, a scientifically groundless, purely political move.

"I came up with a definition in 1973 that made it possible to argue the homosexuality was not a mental disorder." — Robert Spitzer, Editor in Chief, DSM III —

  Spitzer is a Jew of course (as was of course the inventor of Chemical Imbalance Theory, Joseph Schildkraut, who blazed the trail toward mass use of psychotropic medications), though do not hold your breath waiting for EWTN or Catholic Answers to mention any of this. And perhaps here one can propose a homework assignment for the intellectually energetic. Have a look at how many of the APA psychiatrists behind the mentioned changes were Jews, and contrast the results of your research with the circumstance that Jews constitute about 1.8 % of the United States population, then and now. Within European Christendom as a whole, they are dramatically less numerous still, if little less influential, comprising much less than 1 percent of our total population. For now, let us see how many more of these coincidences we can summarily note.



In a few short years, same-sex marriage went from being an untouchable political hot potato to a broadly accepted civil right in eighteen states and the District of Columbia. Jews, and their social justice organizations, helped make that happen. In fact, this magazine was a prophetic voice of marriage equality, supporting same-sex unions in the early 1990s and helping to lay the groundwork for the current wave of victories.


"How Jews Brought America to the Tipping Point on Marriage Equality: Lessons for the Next Social Justice Issues," Jewess Amy Dean bragging in 2014 in Tikkun about the central Athiest-cum-Talmudic-Jew role in the destruction of morality and the family bedrock of ordered civilization, only within European Christendom, of course.



An Aside on the use of the imagery of war, of armed struggle — The Church Militant.

Allow us to save for another day questions of great import touching on ... well no, delving into, whether exclusively spiritual struggle can be meant, or rather if the struggle is to involve the shedding of blood and red martyrdom – this ultimate witnessing to the faith.

Is it God's Will (are we to discern to the best of our limited abilities that it is God's Will), that the role of every faithful Orthodox-Catholic Christian is to meekly submit our necks to the swords and daggers of the evil, such as the sodomite celebrators? Might it rather be the case that we are called upon to witness to the faith through acts of physical courage which do not involve the assumption, the reasonable hope, that our put-on meekness will win the hearts and minds of sodomite sympathizers?

And how adapt Just War theory to current realities, the state power being in the service of evil utterly and the fact that there is no holy Pope to Call the Kings of Christendom for swords about the Cross, but in the place of a man like Pope Saint Pius V we now must confront Talmud and Islam, Usury and Sodomy, ignorant Nationalism and deracinated Internationalism under the leadership of a Pope Francis or whoever this College of Cardinals will elect to succeed him?



The Satanic chief advocate for the revolutionary overthrow of Christendom through the sexualization of children and the legalization of, and widespread practice of, pedophilia and pederasty; highly influential among later Jew practitioners and researchers who chart the course for the "science" of psychoanalysis:  
    Wilhelm Reich (1897 in Dobzau, then part of Austria-Hungary and now in the Ukraine, near Lvov; died in prison in Lewisburg, Pennsylvania in 1957)



Decided by the United States Supreme Court on 22 January 1973, the principals — parties, attorneys, justices — in Roe vs. Wade, 410 U.S.113, were not Jews.   Not so the professors and writers supplying the academic and intellectual groundwork, and glaringly not so with the OB-GYN abortionists on the medical side and their enabling lawyers at the American Civil Liberties Union, the National Lawyers Guild, Amnesty International, the Southern Poverty Law Center and hundreds of other abortion advocacy organizations which have kept the legal mistake and moral abomination of Roe vs. Wade as the law of the land across the intervening decades and over the tens of millions of murdered unborn children. The unwaivering voters for abortion and other such similar, all the Jews on the High Court — Stephen G. Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor (mother Jewish) and Elena Kaganovich, excuse us, Kagan — are only the tip of the iceberg. Have a look at the leaders of Planned Parenthood (94% of budget goes to funding abortions). The most skeletal list of national figures would have to include the likes of Bella Abzug, Emma Goldman, Nancy Miriam Hawley, Esther Rome, Bessie Louise Moses, Barbara Seaman, Laurie Schwab Zabin, and Gloria Steinem. More recently we see the likes of Gloria Feldt, CEO and president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America (1996 to 2005); now, with Amy Litzenberger, another poisonous atheist Jewess, the foundress and leader of Take the Lead; on boards of Women's Media Center and the Jewish Women's Archive. Really, the evidence is too overwhelming. The jury is no longer out. This is an atheist Jew phenomenon, from first to last, a case study in mass murder by Jews, one of many. And by mass murder, 4 or 5 victims are not meant. The death toll is far in excess of one hundred million victims, European Christendom wide. Do not hold your breath waiting for the Catholic Establishment mass media to expose this one key motivating circumstance, though doing so might actually slow this ongoing holocaust. No, instead read about Pope John Paul II telling conductor Gilbert Levine that he should not play the music of Gustav Mahler — a convert to Catholicism — while with the Pope in Isreal, because doing so might send the wrong message to Jews, that the Pope wanted them to embrace Jesus as Christ and God.


Easy, a.k.a., "no-fault" Divorce    

"Irreconcilable differences which have caused the irremediable breakdown of the marriage," with both "irreconcilable differences" and "irremediable breakdown" described in the broadest possible terms, actually became the law of the land governing divorce in California, the first jurisdiction to do so within Christendom, in 1969. Evidence of marital misconduct of the type Christ decreed was declared to be "improper" and "inadmissible."

The prestigious National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws came on board with "No-Fault" divorce in 1967 under the leadership of Professor Robert J. Levy of the University of Minnesota Law School.

And the American Bar Association (ABA) approved the UMDA in its 1973 (slightly) revised form. By 1989, 49 states and the District of Columbia had adopted the "modern no-fault divorce" standard, substantially along the lines of the Levy and Kay standard. (The hold out is Arkansas, which requires a whopping 18-month-long period of separation as a sufficient ground for divorce.)


The change in California's law was lead by Herma Hill Kay, then and now of Boalt Hall, the Law School of the University of California at Berkeley. Wife of Carroll Brodsky; a friend of R.B. Ginsburg; a director of the Rosenberg Foundation; the recipient of the Ruth Bader Ginsburg Lifetime Achievement Award of the Association of American Law Schools; purveyor extraordinaire of a militant anti-Christian view of feminism, this sickening enemy of the Church, of Christian women and of Christendom would need to be made an honorary Jewess were she not already one.

Robert J. Levy — take a wild guess — spearheaded what became the NCCUSL's Uniform Marrige and Divorce Act (UMDA) in 1970: adultery can not be considered for property division.




  '[H]e that committeth adultery with his neighbour's wife' excludes the wife of a heathen..."
... from the Babylonian Talmud, Seder Nezikin, Tractate Sanhedrin, Folio 52b



Sigmund Freud

(1856 to 23 September 1939, Yom Kippur
Death through physician (and Anna Freud) assisted suicide)

The Devilfather of the "sexual revolution":

"Hannibal, with whom I had reached this point of similarity, had been my favourite hero during my years at the Gymnasium; like so many boys of my age, I bestowed my sympathies during the Punic war, not on the Romans, but on the Carthaginians. Then, when I came finally to understand the consequences of belonging to an alien race, and was forced by the anti-semitic sentiment among my class-mates to assume a definite attitude, the figure of the Semitic commander assumed still greater proportions in my eyes. Hannibal and Rome symbolised for me as a youth the antithesis between the tenaciousness of the Jews and the organisation of the Catholic Church."
    Sigismund, a.k.a., Sigmund, Schlomo Freud, in his The Interpretation of Dreams (1913)
  "I have no fear of God at all.... I can measure myself with the best people I have known. I have never done anything mean or malicious, nor felt any temptation to do so ... Sexual morality as defined by society, to the extreme in America, seems to me quite contemptible. I advocate an incomparably freer sexual life ..."
    Freud in 8 July 1915 letter to James Jackson Putnam




A Printable and Broadcastable Lobotomy

Dream weapon of the Enemies of Church and Christendom

Near Complete Jew Monopoly of the Pornography Industry

In pre-Shoah Germany and Europe and in XXI century America



A story little told is that of Jews in Hollywood’s seedier cousin, the adult film industry. Perhaps we’d prefer to pretend that the ‘triple-exthnics’ didn’t exist, but there’s no getting away from the fact that secular Jews have played (and still continue to play) a disproportionate role throughout the adult film industry in America. Jewish involvement in pornography has a long history in the United States, as Jews have helped to transform a fringe subculture into what has become a primary constituent of Americana. These are the ‘true blue Jews’.

Smut peddlers

Jewish activity in the porn industry divides into two (sometimes overlapping) groups: pornographers and performers. Though Jews make up only two per cent of the American population, they have been prominent in pornography. Many erotica dealers in the book trade between 1890 and 1940 were immigrant Jews of German origin. According to Jay A. Gertzman, author of Bookleggers and Smuthounds:The Trade in Erotica, 1920-1940 (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999), ‘Jews were prominent in the distribution of gallantiana [fiction on erotic themes and books of dirty jokes and ballads], avant-garde sexually explicit novels, sex pulps, sexology, and flagitious materials’.

In the postwar era, America’s most notorious pornographer was Reuben Sturman, the ‘Walt Disney of Porn’. According to the US Department of Justice, throughout the 1970s Sturman controlled most of the pornography circulating in the country. Born in 1924 ...[i]t was said that Sturman did not simply control the adult-entertainment industry; he was the industry. Eventually he was convicted of tax evasion and other crimes and died, disgraced, in prison in 1997. His son, David, continued running the family business.

The contemporary incarnation of Sturman is 43-year-old Jewish Clevelander Steven Hirsch, who has been described as ‘the Donald Trump of porno’. The link between the two is Steve’s father, Fred, who was a stockbroker-cum-lieutenant to Sturman. Today Hirsch runs the Vivid Entertainment Group, which has been called the Microsoft of the porn world, the top producer of ‘adult’ films in the US. His specialty was to import mainstream marketing techniques into the porn business. Indeed, Vivid parallels the Hollywood studio system of the 1930s and 1940s, particularly in its exclusive contracts to porn stars who are hired and moulded by Hirsch. Vivid was the subject of a behind-the-scenes reality TV show recently broadcast on Channel 4.

Nice Jewish girls and boys

Jews accounted for most of the leading male performers as well as a sizeable number of female stars in porn movies of the 1970s and ‘80s.

In search of a buck

Jews became involved in the porn industry for much the same reasons that their co-religionists became involved in Hollywood.


The adult entertainment business required something that Jews possessed in abundance: chutzpah. Early Jewish pornographers were marketing geniuses and ambitious entrepreneurs whose toughness, intelligence and boundless self-confidence were responsible for their successes.

Of course, the large number of Jews in porn were mainly motivated by the desire to make profits. Just as their counterparts in Hollywood provided a dream factory for Americans, a blank screen upon which the Jewish moguls’ visions of America could be created and projected, so the porn-moguls displayed a talent for understanding public tastes. What better way to provide the stuff of dreams and fantasies than through the adult-entertainment industry? Performers did porn for the money. As ADL National Director Abraham H. Foxman commented, ‘Those Jews who enter the pornography industry have done so as individuals pursuing the American dream.’

Secular sex


[A]ccording to an editorial on the World Union of Jewish Students website, "there are thousands of people searching for Jewish porn. After things like Jewish calendar, Jewish singles, Jewish dating, and Jewish festivals comes ‘Jewish porn’ in the list of top search keywords that GoTo.com provide".

Sexual rebels


According to one anonymous industry insider quoted by E. Michael Jones in the magazine Culture Wars (May 2003), ‘the leading male performers through the 1980s came from secular Jewish upbringings and the females from Roman Catholic day schools’. The standard porn scenario became as a result a Jewish fantasy of schtupping the Catholic shiksa.

Furthermore, as Orthodox Jew and porn gossipmonger Luke Ford explains on his website (lukeford.net): ‘Porn is just one expression of [the] rebellion against standards, against the disciplined life of obedience to Torah that marks a Jew living Judaism.’


Sexual revolutionaries

Extending the subversive thesis, Jewish involvement in the X-rated industry can be seen as a proverbial two fingers to the entire WASP establishment in America. Some porn stars viewed themselves as frontline fighters in the spiritual battle between Christian America and secular humanism. According to Ford, Jewish X-rated actors often brag about their ‘joy in being anarchic, sexual gadflies to the puritanical beast’. Jewish involvement in porn, by this argument, is the result of an atavistic hatred of Christian authority: they are trying to weaken the dominant culture in America by moral subversion. .... Al Goldstein, the publisher of Screw, said (on lukeford.net), ‘The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks. Catholicism sucks. ... Pornography thus becomes a way of defiling Christian culture and, as it penetrates to the very heart of the American mainstream (and is no doubt consumed by those very same WASPs), its subversive character becomes more charged.


It is a case of the traditional revolutionary/radical drive of immigrant Jews in America being channelled into sexual rather than leftist politics. Just as Jews have been disproportionately represented in radical movements over the years, so they are also disproportionately represented in the porn industry. Jews in America have been sexual revolutionaries. A large amount of the material on sexual liberation was written by Jews. Those at the forefront of the movement which forced America to adopt a more liberal view of sex were Jewish. Jews were also at the vanguard of the sexual revolution of the 1960s. Wilhelm Reich, Herbert Marcuse and Paul Goodman replaced Marx, Trotsky and Lenin as required revolutionary reading. Reich’s central preoccupations were work, love and sex, while Marcuse prophesied that a socialist utopia would free individuals to achieve sexual satisfaction. Goodman wrote of the ‘beautiful cultural consequences’ that would follow from legalizing pornography: it would ‘ennoble all our art’ and ‘humanize sexuality’. Pacheco was one Jewish porn star who read Reich’s intellectual marriage of Freud and Marx (lukeford.net): "Before I got my first part in an adult film, I went down to an audition for an X-rated film with my hair down to my ass, a copy of Wilhelm Reich’s Sexual Revolution under my arm and yelling about work, 'love and sex'."

As Rabbi Samuel H. Dresner put it (E. Michael Jones, ‘Rabbi Dresner’s Dilemma: Torah v. Ethnos’ Culture Wars, May 2003), ‘Jewish rebellion has broken out on several levels’, one being ‘the prominent role of Jews as advocates to sexual experimentation’. Overall, then, porn performers are a group of people who praise rebellion, self-fulfilment and promiscuity.

What are we ashamed of?

This brief overview and analysis of the role and motivations behind pornographers and performers is intended to shed light on a neglected topic in American Jewish popular culture. Little has been written about it. Books such as Howard M. Sachar’s A History of the Jews in America (New York: Knopf, 1992) simply ignore the topic. And you can bet that the 350th anniversary of the arrival of the Jews in the United States did not include any celebrations of Jewish innovation in this field. Even the usually tolerant Time Out New York has been too prim to deal with it, although the more iconoclastic Heeb plans an issue on it. In light of the relatively tolerant Jewish view of sex, why are we ashamed of the Jewish role in the porn industry? We might not like it, but the Jewish role in this field has been significant and it is about time it was written about seriously.

  Excerpts from "Triple-exthnics," Jewish Quarterly, Winter 2004 - Number 196, Nathan Abrams on Jews in the American porn industry: "What are we ashamed of?"







Cultural Marxism


Das Institut für Sozialforschung – the Institute for Social Research, more commonly known as die Frankfurter Schule – the Frankfurt School



But let us please from the very outset resist any temptation to overstate the significance of either this coined term – Cultural Marxism – or the named intellectual collective, the Frankfurt School. The demonaic and the Devil's human and (fallen)angelic willing collaborators work through many means and people and organizations. The Frankfurt School is only one such. Still, it is prominent enough in the civilizational struggles, the cultural wars between Good and evil. And it is brazen enough, in its announced methods of undermining the Christian nature of a confused Christendom, the infiltration many and varied institutions:

  • Christian, better yet Catholic and Orthodox, Churches and their seminaries, priesthoods and episcopates;
  • music or "music" and the visual and performing arts;
  • (Christian founded and once Christian led)-universities;
  • literature of every type and description;
  • print and broadcast mass media, basically just the means of all information selection and dissemination,
  • including that which is explicitly or de facto about "entertainment", read, violence and pornography and the increasingly, brazenly, explicitly diabolical (often abbreviated as Hollywood), as also a substitution at a mass level of real manly activities – work and creation – with a fake, absurd, pseudo-masculinity of watching, but really an obsession with watching, other men play sports! Just a modern day updating of the method of depriving the non-Christian masses of all their residual humanity through Panem et Circenses –Bread and Circuses;
  • and of course, über Alles, that central-most and Divinely-ordained and instituted institution, the family (and on this latter Hollywood has indeed been especially active through its strategy of depicting mothers and more so still fathers as everything weak and ignorant and bad, all across thousands of films, and through its conflation of things LGBT with all things enlightened and desirable,

... all through some gradual "Long March" toward preparing the minds of the people of Christendom – and really the Cultural Marxists' focus is almost exclusively on European Christendom, and not on Ethiopia or Peru or the Philippines – to intellectually and emotionally reject everything Christian and turn instead to a non-Christian (then later increasingly, brazenly, anti-Christian), Leviathan Government, which will control and own the means of production, yes certainly, but which will in fact control everything and everyone, including of course the minds of its own functionaries and leaders.

But even as exhaustive and formidable as the just preceding list may appear, it omits even cursory mention of much of the agenda of the Cutural Marxists – really better understood as Omni Marxism and Omni Marxists. The military and police and surveillance state aspects will of course not be suddenly thrust upon European Christendom and her peoples, so much as these will proceed also through an insidious program of gradualism, through their own parallel Long March. Crisis after crisis will be manufactured to supply the justifications and achieve the popular acquiesce.

And centrally to the Long March scheme, the concentration of productive property, the means of production, in fewer and fewer hands, or in other words the deprivation of any meaningful productive property ownership by the mass of humanity — the extinguishment of the only Christian – and/or, just dignified – economic system in which the ownership of productive property is very widely distributed, as widely distributed as possible, among free private individuals and the families they build or try to build — this condition of concentrated rather than widely-distributed ownership of productive property will proceed apace but gradually. Then in the end, will the mass of people of European Christendom care much that productive property is controlled by the Commissars rather than, for example, the Koch brothers? All these families are mighty indeed and thousands of times wealthier than the just wealthy, but which of them is mightier than was the family of Николай II Романов-Nicholas Romanov? Whether and to what extend individuals understand this or fail to, concentrated crony Capitalism produces and it is the close-spirit brother of Communism. The free market plus (very) widely distributed ownership and control of productive property is Christian.



  But let us pause here and ask, what is this beast, call in Cultural Marxism or the Frankfurt School? Who are the Cultural Marxists or the founding and leading members and principal figures within the Frankfurt School? Are they just random and randomly distributed people within, residents of, European Christendom, and without any other identifying or defining or isolating characteristic(s)? The following list of a baker's dozen named individual founders and leaders of the Frankfurt School would make any honest commentators list of the top fifteen ever:  
  1. Theodor W. Adorno (born, Theodor Ludwig Wiesengrund) (11 September 1903 – 6 August 1969);
  2. Walter Bendix Schönflies Benjamin (15 July 1892 – 26 September 1940);
  3. Erich Seligmann Fromm (23 March 1900 – 18 March 1980);
  4. Henryk Grossmann (14 April 1881 Krakow – Leipzig 24 November 1950);
  5. Max Horkheimer (14 February 1895 Stuttgart – Nuremberg 7 July 1973);
  6. Otto Kirchheimer (11 November 1905 in Heilbronn – New York City 22 November 1965);
  7. Siegfried Kracauer (8 February 1889 Frankfurt – NYC 26 November 1966);
  8. Leo Löwenthal (3 November 1900 – 21 January 1993);
  9. György Lukács/Georg Lukacs (13 April 1885 Hungary – 4 June 1971);
  10. Herbert Marcuse (19 July 1898 Berlin – Stamberg 29 July 1979);
  11. Franz Leopold Neumann (23 May 1900 – 2 September 1954);
  12. Friedrich Pollock (22 May 1894 – 16 December 1970);
  13. Alfred Sohn-Rethel (4 January 1899 Neuilly-sur-Seine near Paris – Bremen 6 April 1990).
  Not household names throughtout European Christendom certainly. How could they be? Who would mass, repeat publicize and trumpet their identities, the above mentioned media outlets? Still, some of these names will likely be familiar to the general reading public. Here is a bit more:  
  1. Theodor W. Adorno, a.k.a.,Wiesengrund wrote The Authoritarian Personality (1950), the leading attack on the patriarchial, read Christian, family, together with co-authors Else Frenkel-Brunswik, a Polish-Austrian Jewess (18 August 1908 Lemberg – Berkeley 31 March 1958) Daniel Levinson, a U. Calif. Berkeley American Jew with a 1947 dissertation on ethnocentrism (28 May 1920 – 12 April 1994), and Nevitt Sanford (1909–1996, the token Shill, obsessed with ethnocentrism and antisemitism);
  2. Walter Bendix Schönflies Benjamin (15 July 1892 – 26 September 1940);
  3. Erich Seligmann Fromm (23 March 1900 – 18 March 1980);
  4. Henryk Grossmann (14 April 1881 Krakow – Leipzig 24 November 1950);
  5. Max Horkheimer (14 February 1895 Stuttgart – Nuremberg 7 July 1973);
  6. Otto Kirchheimer (11 November 1905 in Heilbronn – New York City 22 November 1965);
  7. Siegfried Kracauer (8 February 1889 Frankfurt – NYC 26 November 1966);
  8. Leo Löwenthal (3 November 1900 – 21 January 1993);
  9. György Lukács/Georg Lukacs (13 April 1885 Hungary – 4 June 1971);
  10. Herbert Marcuse (19 July 1898 Berlin – Stamberg 29 July 1979);
  11. Franz Leopold Neumann (23 May 1900 – 2 September 1954);
  12. Friedrich Pollock (22 May 1894 – 16 December 1970);
  13. Alfred Sohn-Rethel (4 January 1899 Neuilly-sur-Seine near Paris – Bremen 6 April 1990).
  The Wine and Cheese Crowd – Or, how Useful it is to have a Controlled Opposition  

Increasing the marching pace during such a Long March has obvious advantages for those who want Omni Marxism to prevail. They can actually live to see it through, very likely an added benefit for atheists. On the other hand, even the marginal loss of the character of gradualism will needs mean that a greater proportion of the population will notice the changes. Even those confident in their ultimate success will recognize that even fledgling friction entails costs and hassles they would rather avoid. Enter the controlled opposition. Offer up a regular diet of expositions of complaints and shock and disgust, and the more added vitriol the better. Even with very well done presentations, maybe especially with well done, comprehensive presentations, the sheer volume of topics covered will overwhelm almost all listeners, yes, but the real point is that something cathartic will have occurred for the mass viewing, or listening, audience. There is no effective solution offered, and the, now exhausted, audience members will feel as though the process of listening and feeling solidarity with other listeners was their contribution. The leader or leaders of the particular controlled opposition outlet in question will allow themselves to think, more or less, depending on their own respective levels of perceptiveness and integrity, that they are at the top of some intellectual pyramid of righteousness. If, for example, some writer makes a presentation to a hall full of 600 listeners, that leader will imagine that he has now informed and energized each such listener, or at least a goodly number of them. That crowd will go forth, and some great multiplier effect machine will have been set in motion by him or her. "Gee, I am not the leader of a measly 600 guys. What is that compared to the forces arrayed against us? No, in fact those 600, though not as effective as I am, to be sure, but still, they might each go out and recruit another 300. So really, I am the generalissimo of 180,000, and onward we march." OK, this is put in an exaggerated form. Still, the basic point is accurate. In fact, the audience members, or almost all of them, will view their participation in the evening as having itself constituted a contribution. Maybe a few of them even asked a good question. Maybe later a few of them will actually discuss the matters raised with some family or friends or colleagues, attempting, maybe achieving a summary of arguments raised by the primary presenter, albeit at a much reduced level of knowledge and skill. And there it ends. Just take stock folks. Over the decades of your activities, have things gotten better? Have the tables been turned on evil-doers and on evil? Has the rate of descent even slowed?

Might the matter be different if real action-point solutions did exist and were a part of the principal presentations? Let us hope, yes, but here one exits the realm of controlled opposition.

Turning from such general points to the matter directly at hand ...




In a few short years, same-sex marriage went from being an untouchable political hot potato to a broadly accepted civil right in eighteen states and the District of Columbia. Jews, and their social justice organizations, helped make that happen. In fact, this magazine was a prophetic voice of marriage equality, supporting same-sex unions in the early 1990s and helping to lay the groundwork for the current wave of victories.


"How Jews Brought America to the Tipping Point on Marriage Equality: Lessons for the Next Social Justice Issues," Jewess Amy Dean bragging in 2014 in Tikkun about the central Athiest-cum-Talmudic-Jew role in the destruction of morality and the family bedrock of ordered civilization, only within European Christendom, of course.






  Materialism is such a pessimistic and fatalistic drag.  
    – quotation from United European Christendom –  


Marx in Moscow

Proletarier aller Länder vereinigt Euch! (Vereinen unter uns, das ist.)
Proletarians of all Countries, Unite! (Unite under us, that is.)

  Yossel (Joe) Mashel Slovo (1926-1995)
Jew and leader of the South African Communist Party (SACP), and
a leading member of the African National Congress









Das Geld ist der eifrige Gott Israels, vor welchem kein andrer Gott bestehen darf. Das Geld erniedrigt alle Götter des Menschen - und verwandelt |375| sie in eine Ware. Das Geld ist der allgemeine, für sich selbst konstituierte Wert aller Dinge. Es hat daher die ganze Welt, die Menschenwelt wie die Natur, ihres eigentümlichen Wertes beraubt. Das Geld ist das dem Menschen entfremdete Wesen seiner Arbeit und seines Daseins, und dies fremde Wesen beherrscht ihn, und er betet es an.

Der Gott der Juden hat sich verweltlicht, er ist zum Weltgott geworden. Der Wechsel ist der wirkliche Gott des Juden. Sein Gott ist nur der illusorische Wechsel.


Money is the jealous god of Israel, in face of which no other god may exist. Money degrades all the gods of man – and turns them into commodities. Money is the universal self-established value of all things. It has, therefore, robbed the whole world – both the world of men and nature – of its specific value. Money is the estranged essence of man’s work and man’s existence, and this alien essence dominates him, and he worships it.

The god of the Jews has become secularized and has become the god of the world. The bill of exchange is the real god of the Jew. His god is only an illusory bill of exchange.

  Marx, zur Judenfrage – on the Jewish Question
The Catholic understands ... even how ancient Israel (the little violent people, before they got poisoned, while they were yet National in the mountains of Judea) was, in the old dispensation at least, central and (as we Catholics say) sacred: devoted to a peculiar mission.
  Hilaire Belloc in Europe and the Faith "Sine auctoritate nulla vita"




Stalin with Николай Иванович Ежов – Nikolai Ivanovich Yezhov, The Malignant Dwarf, also a homosexual.   Stalin sans Николай Иванович Ежов – Nikolai Ivanovich Yezhov, The Malignant Dwarf, also a homosexual, dead and a non-person

Николай Иванович Ежов – Nikolai Ivanovich Yezhov, The Malignant Dwarf, mass murder of Christians many years before the Shoah, Jew and homosexual.




  Stalin sans Yezhov. These two photos from Wikicommons and a thousand other places. Those with Stalin and not erased into non-existence are Вячеслав Молотов – Vyacheslav Molotov (1890 – 1986), of Molotov cocktail fame, whose longevity serves as one more reminder of the patent absurdity of the atheist-cum-Talmudic Jew prayer and purported belief that wickedness will needs be punished in this life, virtue rewarded. Pictured to the viewer's far left is Климент Ворошилов – Kliment Voroshilov (1881 – 1969), ditto. Molotov was married to Jewess "Полина Семёновна Жемчужина – Polina Semyonovna Zhemchuzhina," actually born Perl Karpovskaya; Voroshilov to Екатерина Давидовна – Ekaterina Davidovna, actually born Гитля Горбман – Gitl Gorbman.




  Andrei Sakharov honored at Russia's first university in Saint Petersburg  
  In New York sure, but here we find А. Д. Сахаров – A.D. Sakharov (1921-1989) honored next to the main building of Russia's first university, Saint Petersburg State University. Don't you see? Atheist Jews are not the Bolshevik vanguard. Oh no. They are the heroic dissidents against Communism. We must be grateful to them for liberating us all. Absurd nonsense.  



“Evidently the virus started by Morgenthau and Baruch of a Semitic revenge against all Germans is still working. Harrison [a U.S. State Department official] and his associates indicate that they feel German civilians should be removed from houses for the purpose of housing Displaced Persons. There are two errors in this assumption. First, when we remove an individual German we punish an individual German, while the punishment is not intended for the individual but for the race. Furthermore, it is against my Anglo-Saxon conscience to remove a person from a house, which is a punishment, without due process of law. In the second place, Harrison and his ilk believe that the Displaced Person is a human being, which he is not, and this applies particularly to the Jews, who are lower than animals.”
  General George S. Patton Jr. (11 November 1885 – 21 December 1945) in diary entry of September 1945
“I have been at Frankfurt for a civil government conference. If what we are doing [to the Germans] is ‘Liberty’, then give me death. I can’t see how Americans can sink so low. It is Semitic, and I am sure of it.”
  General George S. Patton Jr. in a September 1945 letter to his wife
“Many high-ranking military persons hated Patton. I know who killed him because I was hired to set up the accident by General William Donovan for $10,000. But since Patton didn’t die in the accident, he was kept in isolation in the hospital where he was killed with an injection. [of air to cause an embolism]”
  Former OSS agent Douglas Bazata [mother a Jew] in comments on 25 September 1979 at the Washington Hilton to other former OSS agents



  The joint Soviet-American Solution to the Nationalities Question  
  Psychological Operations (Psy-Ops), the University of Chicago (Rockefellers), Social Engineering, Internal Mass Migration in the USA and USSR and the Ethnic Cleansing of the Descendants of European Christendom  
Not one American in a thousand in 2017 will have even heard of the German-born, American Jew, Louis Wirth (1897-1952), though the man, in an entirely negative sense, was one of the most important, that is, influential Americans in history. He was the intellectual leader of American Psychological Operations within the sister organization to the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the United States Office of War Information (OWI). (The names are not important for most purposes, and indeed they shifted and changed often, much like those of the Soviet Union, as in Cheka > GPU > OGPU > NKVD > NKGB > MGB > KGB > and now FSB.) Sometime Professor Wirth of the [Rockefeller] University of Chicago lead the cultural war against Catholic America during and after World War II, chiefly through the means of breaking up the Catholic neighborhoods which had been the backbone of northern, urban industrial America, through mass internal migration of Sub-Saharan African Americans from the southern states to northern urban America. To be sure, you will not find references to these facts within the works of Simon Wiesenthal or Elie Wiesel, but German-, Irish-, Polish- and Italian-Catholics were singled out by the Stalin-admiring Wirth, as being untrustworthy, "suspect" Americans. Their integrity, their way of life, their schools, their neighborhoods needed to be destroyed. Unassimilable African Americans were the weapon. See, for example, L. Wirth's The Urban Society and Civilization. (1940) and The Present Position of Minorities in the United States, Studies in Political Science and Sociology, University of Pennsylvania Bicentennial Conference (Philadelphia, Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 1941).



“The modern media of communication are engaged in a Luciferian conspiracy against the truth.”
  Often attributed to Father John A. Hardon, S.J. (* 18 June 1914 – 30 December 2000 †) because he reproduces the quotation with an agreement which repeats to the last echo. Father Hardon refers to a statement made by Canadian philosopher Marshall McLuhan (1911-1980). Did either McLuhan or Father Hardon understand, did either have the courage to state plainly and publicly, that the communication media, the Luciferian enterprise, to which they refer was, by the second-half, XX-century time period on which they focus, nearly entirely in the hands of atheist and Talmudic Jews? And what about those who quote Hardon or McLuhan now in the XXI century?





В городе появилась книгоноша, продававшая евангелие, почтенная женщина, хотя и из мещанского звания. О ней заговорили, потому что о книгоношах только что появились любопытные отзывы в столичных газетах. Опять тот же плут [Еврей, Жид, Скупец, Скряга, Жидовинъ] Лямшин, с помощью одного семинариста, праздношатавшегося в ожидании учительского места в школе, подложил потихоньку книгоноше в мешок, будто бы покупая у нее книги, целую пачку соблазнительных мерзких фотографий из-за границы, нарочно пожертвованных для сего случая, как узнали потом, одним весьма почтенным старичком, фамилию которого опускаю, с важным орденом на шее и любившим, по его выражению, "здоровый смех и веселую шутку". Когда бедная женщина стала вынимать святые книги у нас в Гостином Ряду, то посыпались и фотографии. Поднялся смех, ропот; толпа стеснилась, стали ругаться, дошло бы и до побоев, если бы не подоспела полиция. Книгоношу заперли в каталашку, и только вечером, стараниями Маврикия Николаевича, с негодованием узнавшего интимные подробности этой гадкой истории, освободили и выпроводили из города.


A respectable woman of the artisan class, who went about selling gospels, came into the town. People talked about her, because some interesting references to these gospel women had just appeared in the Petersburg Capers. Again the same buffoon, [the Jew] Lyamshin, with the help of a divinity student, who was taking a holiday while waiting for a post in the school, succeeded, on the pretence of buying books from the gospel woman, in thrusting into her bag a whole bundle of indecent and obscene photographs from abroad, sacrificed expressly for the purpose, as we learned afterwards, by a highly respectable old gentleman (I will omit his name) with an order on his breast, who, to use his own words, loved “a healthy laugh and a merry jest.” When the poor woman went to take out the holy books in the bazaar, the photographs were scattered about the place. There were roars of laughter and murmurs of indignation. A crowd collected, began abusing her, and would have come to blows if the police had not arrived in the nick of time. The gospel woman was taken to the lock-up, and only in the evening, thanks to the efforts of Mavriky Nikolaevitch, who had learned with indignation the secret details of this loathsome affair, she was released and escorted out of the town.

          from Бесы – Demons or The Devils or The Possessed, 1871-1872,
by Фёдор Михайлович Достоевский Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoyevsky
(* 30 October [N.S. 11 November] 1821 — 28 January [N.S. 9 February] 1881 †)
Часть вторая, Глава Глава пятая Part II, Chapter 5




    The Debt- Basis of the Money Supply and the Central Bank cancer within Christendom
    The leadership of the central bank of the United States of America — the Federal Reserve System, a.k.a., the Federal Reserve or just the Fed — consists in the first instance of a Board of Governors or Federal Reserve Board (FRB), its main governing body. There are statutorily seven such governors or members, two of whom are appointed by the President of the United States to be the Chairman and Vice Chairman, respectively, of the Fed. They serve for a 14-year term without eligibility for reappointment, though as they can also serve out other member's terms, as a practical matter governors can and do serve still longer than 14 years. Theoretically these governors can be removed by the President for cause, but this rarely happens. There are also twelve regional Federal Reserve Banks, each with a president, and those twelve, together with the seven governors of the FRB — so 19 persons in total — make up the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), though through a system which might seem strange, only five of the twelve regional bank presidents, New York plus four others by rotation, can vote at a given time. As of this 30 November 2015 writing, of the seven FRB governors' slots, two are vacant. There are only five governors, namely: Janet Yellen as Chair and Stanley Fischer as Vice-Chair plus Lael Brainard; Jerome H. Powell; and Daniel Tarullo. As the Chair and Vice-Chair are so prominent and important in the Federal Reserve System, it makes sense to single them out even within a FOMC with only ten voting members. The current and recent occupants of these two key-most positions in the American banking system, economy and society are:
    ex Cathedra, Oh, excuse us, the Chair Vice Chair

Case Study -

the United States
Federal Reserve System

  • Janet Yellen (incumbent since 1 February 2014);
  • Ben Shalom Bernanke (1 February 2006 – 31 January 2014);
  • Alan Grynszpan or Grünspan or Greenspan (11 August 1987 – 31 January 2006).
  • Stanley Fischer (incumbent since 16 June 2014; note was Governor of the Bank of Israel from 1 May 2005 – 30 June 2013);
  • Janet Yellen (4 October 2010 – 31 January 2014);
  • Donald Kohn (23 June 2006 – 23 June 2010).

Five of these five key policy makers are Jews.

No mere 65 percent, like in the national organization of the early Bolshevik regime (though in the local Bolshevik organizations, were the mass murders actually were carried out, the Jews often constituted 95 percent of the cadre, not merely 65 percent). In the America of the early XXI century they are at the top of their game, with 100 percent. And the non-Jews at the lower levels are completely formed by and caught up in the ruling culture and spirituality. Were they to move into the top-most positions, for display purposes for example, no discernable change would be forthcoming. If not so already, it will soon be the case that writing these truths will be deemed hate crimes by the Jews who utterly control the personnel and culture of the bar and the bench in America.





  The Black-Jewish Alliance?  
  Atheist and Talmudic Jews  
  at the epicenter of the Transatlantic slave trade and slave auctions and slave ownership  
  And how appropriate that the first synagogue in the United States of America would be in Newport, Rhode Island, as Newport was the center of the African slave trade in the United States at that time, the terminal point of the Middle Passage for Sub-Saharan Africans in the transatlantic slave trade dominated by the Jews, a very different sort of Black-Jewish Alliance to that of the 20th Century. Do not hold your breath waiting for the hyper-hypocrites of Hollywood to come out with a docudrama miniseries exposé of this shameful, multi-century, civilizational-level chapter in the bimillennial saga of the revolutionary, Talmudic-cum-atheist Jew and his struggle against Christ, Church and Christendom.  


17 August 1790
Newport, Rhode Island

We the Master, Wardens, and Brethren, of King David's Lodge, in Newport, Rhode Island with Joyful hearts embrace this Opportunity, to greet you as a Brother and to hail you welcome to Rhode Island. We exult in the thought that as Masonry has always been patronised by the wise, the good, and the great; so hath it stood and ever will stand as its fixtures are on the immutable pillars of faith, hope, and Charity.

With unspeakable pleasure we Gratulate you as filling the Presidential Chair with the applause of a numerous and enlightened people, whilst, at the same time, we felicitate ourselves in the honour done the Brotherhood by your many exemplary Virtues and emanations of Goodness proceeding from a heart worthy of possessing the Antient Mysteries of our craft; being persuaded that the wisdom and Grace with which heaven has endowed you, will ever square all your thoughts, words, and actions by the eternal Laws of honour, equity, and truth, so as to promote the advancement of all good works; your own happiness, and that of mankind.

Permit us then Illustrious Brother cordially to Salute you with Three times Three and to add your fervent supplications that the Sovereign Architect of the Universe may always encompass you with his holy protection.

Moses Seixas, the Worshipful Master of King David’s Lodge,
Henry Sherburne,
William Littlefield (obviously formerly Kleinfeld), secretary.
(Unlike the first lodge of the Freemasons in Newport, St. John's Lodge from the 1740s, where 14 Jews, including Seixas, were joined by non-Jews, King David's Lodge, organized in New York in 1769 by Moses Michael Hays and removed to Newport in 1780, was completely Jew.)
18 August 1790
Newport, Rhode Island

To the Masons of King David’s Lodge, Newport, Rhode Island


I receive the welcome which you give me to Rhode-Island with pleasure—and I acknowledge my obligations for the flattering expressions of regard contained in your address with grateful sincerity.

Being persuaded that a just application of the principles, on which the masonic fraternity is founded, must be promotive of private virtue and public prosperity, I shall always be happy to advance the interests of the Society, and to be considered by them a deserving Brother.

My best wishes, Gentlemen, are offered for your individual happiness.

  George Washington, President of the United States


newport_rhode_island_touro_synagogue_sign   newport_rhode_island_touro_synagogue_plaque



NAACP   New York Ethical Society and Ethical Culture School all atheist and Talmudic Jew

Not Sub-Saharan Africans or their descendants in the United States of America or elsewhere, instigated and lead and financed the NAACP, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. From its founding in 1909 this was an Atheist and Talmudic Jew instigated and financed and lead organization, to serve the perceived interests of the Jews, who couldn't care less about the welfare, temporal or eternal, of the African.

Eighty percent of their children born out of wedlock; and more than seventy percent grow up (sort of) without a father: the gift of the Jews to the Descendants of Sub-Saharan Africa who have citizenship of the United States of America.



New York Ethical Society (and Ethical Culture School), in Manhattan of course — To do away with theology and unite theists, atheists, agnostics and deists, all in the same anti-religious cause. In other words, they do violence to any notion of ethics.

Some founders and early leading figures, all Jew:

  • Henry Moskowitz (also of the atheist New York Society for Ethical Culture);
  • Jacob Schiff (also, in today's money, Billionaire Banker and Bolshevik Jew key financier and enabler);
  • Joel Spingarn (nominally Presbyterian, Columbia University already lost), wife Amy Einstein Spingarn and brother Arthur B. Spingarn;
  • Julius Rosenwald (also leader shareholder of Sears, Roebuck & Co);
  • Rabbi Stephen Samuel Wise (Weisz);
  • Jacob Billikopf;
  • Rabbi Emil G. Hirsch (also an atheist "Feminsim" leader).






Yet the atheist and Talmudic Jews are all for American Exceptionalism, which, if only paradoxically, serves their Internationalist Agenda

So it is thumbs up to the exceptionalism of The dis United States of Jewmerica but thumbs down to Lindbergh's America First to keep America out of Churchill's War


New York, NY, April 28, 2016 … The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) today urged presidential candidate Donald Trump to reconsider his use of the phrase “America First” as a slogan describing his approach to foreign affairs, citing its anti-Semitic use in the months before Pearl Harbor by a group of prominent Americans seeking to keep the nation out of World War II.

The most noteworthy leader of the “America First Committee” was Charles Lindbergh, who sympathized with the Nazis and whose rhetoric was characterized by anti-Semitism and offensive stereotypes, including assertions that Jews posed a threat to the U.S. because of their influence in motion pictures, radio, the press, and the government.

“The undercurrents of anti-Semitism and bigotry that characterized the America First movement – including the assumption that Jews who opposed the movement had their own agenda and were not acting in America’s best interest – is fortunately not a major concern today,” said Jonathan A. Greenblatt, ADL CEO. “However, for many Americans, the term ‘America First’ will always be associated with and tainted by this history. In a political season that already has prompted a national conversation about civility and tolerance, choosing a call to action historically associated with incivility and intolerance seems ill-advised.”

In a letter to Mr. Trump, ADL urged him to refrain from using the slogan in the future.

    reproduced without permission but as Fair Comment on the enemies of Chruch and Christendom  




The sons of Noah who went forth from the ark were Shem, Ham, and Japheth. Ham was the father of Canaan. These three were the sons of Noah; and from these the whole earth was peopled. Noah was the first tiller of the soil. He planted a vineyard; and he drank of the wine, and became drunk, and lay uncovered in his tent. And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brothers outside. Then Shem and Japheth took a garment, laid it upon both their shoulders, and walked backward and covered the nakedness of their father; their faces were turned away, and they did not see their father's nakedness. When Noah awoke from his wine and knew what his youngest son had done to him, he said, "Cursed be Canaan; a slave of slaves shall he be to his brothers." He also said, "Blessed by the LORD my God be Shem; and let Canaan be his slave." God enlarge Japheth, and let him dwell in the tents of Shem; and let Canaan be his slave."      
  Genesis 9:18-27     Babylonian Talmud Sanhedrin



  But before turning toNostra Aetate— this pastoral document of this pastoral council , ego neither infallible or binding — some reminders of the Eternal Truths of the Orthodox-Catholic Church:  


  They answered him, “Abraham is our father.” Jesus said to them, If you were Abraham’s children, you would do what Abraham did, 40 but now you seek to kill me, a man who has told you the truth which I heard from God; this is not what Abraham did. 41 You do what your father did. They said to him, “We were not born of fornication; we have one Father, even God.” 42 Jesus said to them, If God were your Father, you would love me, for I proceeded and came forth from God; I came not of my own accord, but he sent me. 43 Why do you not understand what I say? It is because you cannot bear to hear my word. 44 You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, and has nothing to do with the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks according to his own nature, for he is a liar and the father of lies. 45 But, because I tell the truth, you do not believe me. 46 Which of you convicts me of sin? If I tell the truth, why do you not believe me? 47 He who is of God hears the words of God; the reason why you do not hear them is that you are not of God.  
    John 8:39-47  


  Could anything possibly be more clear, more authoritative, more despositive, more binding?  


  For this is the will of my Father, that every one who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.  
    John 6:40  


  He who believes in the Son has eternal life; he who does not obey the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God rests upon him.  
    John 3:36  


  Who is the liar but he who denies that Jesus is the Christ? This is the antichrist, he who denies the Father and the Son. No one who denies the Son has the Father. He who confesses the Son has the Father also.  
    1 John 2:22-23  


  Believing in Jesus Christ and in the One who sent him for our salvation is necessary for obtaining that salvation. [FN42: Cf. 16:16; Jn 3:36; 6:40 et al.] Since without faith it is impossible to please [God] and to attain to the fellowship of his sons, therefore without faith no one has ever attained justification, nor will anyone obtain eternal life But he who endures to the end. [FN43: 43 Dei Filius 3:DS 3012; cf. Mt 10:22; 24:13 and Heb 11:6; Council of Trent:DS 1532.]  
    Catechism of the Catholic Church § 161 [emphasis added]  


    ...New Testament OTJQ.





"Rise, and have no fear."   "This is my beloved Son, with whom I am well pleased; listen to him." the Holy Spirit Man proposes, God disposes